Bloodletting appears a distant absurdity to us yet, only a few hundred Years ago; we lost George Washington because he trusted its rhetoric logic when he consented to it as remedy for a nasty cold. With just a few quiet voices protesting the innumerable deaths brought on by bloodletting, the practice continued well into the 20th century. Today’s bicycle helmet promotions and legislation hold an alarming resemblance to the pronouncements employed by the blood letters. Once an illogical practice is introduced as the only means of security and dismissal of the clinic is conducive to certain death, even the most brilliant leader can succumb to its absurdity.
Truth about helmets appeals countries most where bicycling isn’t commonplace. In such states, helmet rhetoric has escalated to the point where people not knowledgeable about bicycling consider that if you so much as swing your leg over a bicycle without wearing a helmet you will smash your mind open. In these areas, those who ride a bicycle without a helmet are chided by onlookers at every turn for their reckless, reckless behaviour. Most helmet propaganda is Originally released by insurance companies, health professionals and government agencies that have prevented countless law suits by attributing bicyclists in crashes for not wearing a helmet, sometimes even if their injuries or death didn’t involve injuries to their head.
While studies have shown that bicycle helmets do little to stop major head injuries involving minor skull fractures and lacerations Curnow 2001, some poorly implemented, misleading studies are the only ones to have attained mainstream supply. The most common piece of jargon of them all is that cycle helmets prevent 85% of head injuries and 88% of brain injuries when in actuality, where helmet use is high there has been no detectable decrease in head injuries and so ride safe with an ebike helmet. For a fascinating contrast of these very misleading studies, see the link below. Helmet rhetoric which sets bicycling out as far more dangerous than it is is the greatest deterrent to programs for rising bicycling. A lot of truthful yet tricky promotions will be essential to counter these sounds. Bear in mind, bloodletting was common sense for 2,000 years! Mandatory helmet legislation frequently follows the spread of bike helmet Rhetoric, including the weight of the law to the thought that bicycling is more dangerous than any other form of transport. In actuality, as you will have found in the above quiz, if these laws required a sensible approach to their effort to avoid head injuries, all pedestrians and vehicle drivers will be required to wear helmets also. And, it appears, a law requiring the wearing of helmets within the home would also be a fantastic idea.